<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Airfang's Tech Talks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://airfang.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://airfang.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Rediscover QQ/TM by Raymond Wong</title>
		<link>http://airfang.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/rediscover-qqtm/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airfang.wordpress.com/?p=37#comment-69</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know anything about QQ until I married my wife in Mainland China.  Young relatives and her friends talked about QQ.  I discover the ease of use when I started using the english 2009 QQ.  It worked very well for about one month and it won&#039;t let me use it again.  I wonder if my Vista Window has something to do with it.  I tried various other versions from QQ2003 to QQ2007.  It worked in QQ2007 but quality and my voice were terrible.  I had to tried other 2009 version (chinese ones) and they won&#039;t work.  I somehow bump into TM QQ 2009 and I can QQ my wife again.  We communicate by Video and microphone chat.  It is much better than telephone and the cost is free other than internet subscription.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know anything about QQ until I married my wife in Mainland China.  Young relatives and her friends talked about QQ.  I discover the ease of use when I started using the english 2009 QQ.  It worked very well for about one month and it won&#8217;t let me use it again.  I wonder if my Vista Window has something to do with it.  I tried various other versions from QQ2003 to QQ2007.  It worked in QQ2007 but quality and my voice were terrible.  I had to tried other 2009 version (chinese ones) and they won&#8217;t work.  I somehow bump into TM QQ 2009 and I can QQ my wife again.  We communicate by Video and microphone chat.  It is much better than telephone and the cost is free other than internet subscription.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qt 4.3.4 + CMake + Visual Studio 2008 doesn&#8217;t work by airfang</title>
		<link>http://airfang.wordpress.com/2008/03/30/qt-434-cmake-visual-studio-2008-doesnt-work/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>airfang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airfang.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-52</guid>
		<description>@ Dat: I meant building Qt4 applications, not compiling Qt4.
@ Lol: care to elaborate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Dat: I meant building Qt4 applications, not compiling Qt4.<br />
@ Lol: care to elaborate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qt 4.3.4 + CMake + Visual Studio 2008 doesn&#8217;t work by Lol</title>
		<link>http://airfang.wordpress.com/2008/03/30/qt-434-cmake-visual-studio-2008-doesnt-work/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Lol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airfang.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-51</guid>
		<description>your doing it wrong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your doing it wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yay! CUDA SDK is running properly! by airfang</title>
		<link>http://airfang.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/yay-cuda-sdk-is-running-properly/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>airfang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airfang.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-47</guid>
		<description>You were not able to use the official driver and the modified INF (inside the workaround link)? I would make sure the driver is installed properly because when things go wrong you have a better chance to rule out the driver issue first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were not able to use the official driver and the modified INF (inside the workaround link)? I would make sure the driver is installed properly because when things go wrong you have a better chance to rule out the driver issue first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yay! CUDA SDK is running properly! by PhycoFalcon</title>
		<link>http://airfang.wordpress.com/2008/06/20/yay-cuda-sdk-is-running-properly/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>PhycoFalcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airfang.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Sweet! You totally pointed me in the right direction, and now I have the Forceware drivers installed on my MacBook Pro, 8600M GT, in Windows XP 32-bit.
One thing is-- I had to use this driver:
http://www.laptopvideo2go.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=19110
Only difficulty is that a couple of things didn&#039;t copy during installation, but it works fine for me so they must have been relatively unimportant. The driver shows up as updated in the nvidia control panel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet! You totally pointed me in the right direction, and now I have the Forceware drivers installed on my MacBook Pro, 8600M GT, in Windows XP 32-bit.<br />
One thing is&#8211; I had to use this driver:<br />
<a href="http://www.laptopvideo2go.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=19110" rel="nofollow">http://www.laptopvideo2go.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=19110</a><br />
Only difficulty is that a couple of things didn&#8217;t copy during installation, but it works fine for me so they must have been relatively unimportant. The driver shows up as updated in the nvidia control panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qt 4 + CMake + Visual Studio rules now by Apolo</title>
		<link>http://airfang.wordpress.com/2008/03/31/qt-4-cmake-visual-studio-rules-now/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Apolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airfang.wordpress.com/?p=13#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I would appreciate very much if you give me a hand with QT and VS2005... I can&#039;t create even the simplest &quot;Hello World&quot; application. I&#039;m not an experienced programmer and probably I&#039;m doing some very basic error. I would appreciate very much if you give me a hand with a simple way of implementing at least the hello world app. I have downloaded the qt-win-opensource-4.4.0-mingw.exe file and executed, it was possible to see the demos and everything in the precompiled samples (there are several DLLs in the bin folder of QT4.4.0, maybe I should use this in some way directly).
When doing the &quot;configure&quot; step I think there was no problem, but when doing the &quot;make&quot; step it goes out with a couple of errors:

collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
mingw32-make[2]: *** [..\..\..\bin\rcc.exe] Error 1
mingw32-make[2]: Leaving directory `C:/yarpStuff/QT440/src/tools/rcc&#039;
mingw32-make[1]: *** [release] Error 2
mingw32-make[1]: Leaving directory `C:/yarpStuff/QT440/src/tools/rcc&#039;
mingw32-make: *** [sub-rcc-make_default-ordered] Error 2

Thanks in advance for your help.
Apolo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I would appreciate very much if you give me a hand with QT and VS2005&#8230; I can&#8217;t create even the simplest &#8220;Hello World&#8221; application. I&#8217;m not an experienced programmer and probably I&#8217;m doing some very basic error. I would appreciate very much if you give me a hand with a simple way of implementing at least the hello world app. I have downloaded the qt-win-opensource-4.4.0-mingw.exe file and executed, it was possible to see the demos and everything in the precompiled samples (there are several DLLs in the bin folder of QT4.4.0, maybe I should use this in some way directly).<br />
When doing the &#8220;configure&#8221; step I think there was no problem, but when doing the &#8220;make&#8221; step it goes out with a couple of errors:</p>
<p>collect2: ld returned 1 exit status<br />
mingw32-make[2]: *** [..\..\..\bin\rcc.exe] Error 1<br />
mingw32-make[2]: Leaving directory `C:/yarpStuff/QT440/src/tools/rcc&#8217;<br />
mingw32-make[1]: *** [release] Error 2<br />
mingw32-make[1]: Leaving directory `C:/yarpStuff/QT440/src/tools/rcc&#8217;<br />
mingw32-make: *** [sub-rcc-make_default-ordered] Error 2</p>
<p>Thanks in advance for your help.<br />
Apolo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qt 4.3.4 + CMake + Visual Studio 2008 doesn&#8217;t work by Dat Chu</title>
		<link>http://airfang.wordpress.com/2008/03/30/qt-434-cmake-visual-studio-2008-doesnt-work/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Dat Chu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airfang.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I know that this question might be a bit weird but what is the benefit of getting a VS9 solution for Qt4 with Cmake? Unless we are making changes to Qt4, can&#039;t we just follow the conventional configure -&gt; nmake?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that this question might be a bit weird but what is the benefit of getting a VS9 solution for Qt4 with Cmake? Unless we are making changes to Qt4, can&#8217;t we just follow the conventional configure -&gt; nmake?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Qt 4.3.4 + CMake + Visual Studio 2008 doesn&#8217;t work by Bill Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://airfang.wordpress.com/2008/03/30/qt-434-cmake-visual-studio-2008-doesnt-work/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airfang.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

This should work.  I have build QT applications with CMake and VS 9 with no problem.  In fact the new version of CMake has a qt based GUI and it builds fine.  If you could provide me with a complete example that should work, I could try and figure out what is wrong.  Here is the cmake file for the cmake-gui in qt:

http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Source/QtDialog/CMakeLists.txt?revision=1.16&amp;root=CMake&amp;view=markup

It works with VS 9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>This should work.  I have build QT applications with CMake and VS 9 with no problem.  In fact the new version of CMake has a qt based GUI and it builds fine.  If you could provide me with a complete example that should work, I could try and figure out what is wrong.  Here is the cmake file for the cmake-gui in qt:</p>
<p><a href="http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Source/QtDialog/CMakeLists.txt?revision=1.16&amp;root=CMake&amp;view=markup" rel="nofollow">http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Source/QtDialog/CMakeLists.txt?revision=1.16&amp;root=CMake&amp;view=markup</a></p>
<p>It works with VS 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Google Calender feature: sync with Microsoft Outlook by Dat Chu</title>
		<link>http://airfang.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/new-google-calender-feature-sync-with-microsoft-outlook/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Dat Chu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airfang.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Considering that many of Google users are Mac users, I think a version of two way sync for iCal is coming. I think that paying a premium is part of living life in the edge. No pay, no play as simply put. You should cherish the time that you have now. After all $65 is just a drop in the bucket comparing to the development cost of a piece of software.

Here is a hint, for one of your development class, why use this as a term program?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that many of Google users are Mac users, I think a version of two way sync for iCal is coming. I think that paying a premium is part of living life in the edge. No pay, no play as simply put. You should cherish the time that you have now. After all $65 is just a drop in the bucket comparing to the development cost of a piece of software.</p>
<p>Here is a hint, for one of your development class, why use this as a term program?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google OS: the omega phase of Google’s monopoly? by Sammy Larbi</title>
		<link>http://airfang.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/google-os-the-omega-phase-of-google%e2%80%99s-monopoly/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy Larbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://airfang.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t doubt it one bit.  A while back, I had wanted to do a web-based &quot;OS&quot; but it never got off the ground.  I had the core user-management and plugin architecture built, but no apps.

On the other hand, the way I envisioned it was for enterprise, not for the common user.  I can now see that the common user would work though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t doubt it one bit.  A while back, I had wanted to do a web-based &#8220;OS&#8221; but it never got off the ground.  I had the core user-management and plugin architecture built, but no apps.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the way I envisioned it was for enterprise, not for the common user.  I can now see that the common user would work though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
